Nowadays

Framing how buyers think about competition

September 29, 2025

TL;DR

Nowadays does something most SaaS companies avoid. It answers the “Why choose us?” question on its homepage.

This matters because that question is already on every buyer’s mind. They’re evaluating Nowadays while mentally comparing it to whatever they’re currently using or considering. But instead of letting prospects figure out the answer themselves, Nowadays takes control of the differentiation narrative.

You’ll learn:

  • How to control the competitive narrative on your homepage
  • How to build a strong “Why us” section on your homepage
  • Why grouping competitors under one deprecating bucket works
  • Why dramatic visuals make differentiation visceral
  • When the “Why us” on the homepage works and when it can backfire

Company profile

Nowadays is an AI copilot for corporate event planning. Founded in 2023 by Anna Sun and Amy Yan, Nowadays is a San Francisco startup backed by Y combinator.

What makes Nowadays’ homepage stand out

Walk through a typical SaaS homepages and you’ll often find competitive comparisons or differentiation signals hidden away.

Maybe there are a few “us vs. competitor” links buried in footer navigation. Maybe there’s a comparison section tucked under pricing. Maybe they avoid the topic entirely and hope buyers just focus on features. In some cases, you might see a “Before Us” vs. “With Us” comparison section. But that’s about it.

The Nowadays team puts the “Why choose us?” section on their homepage, where buyers are actively forming first impressions and evaluating options.

The Why Choose Us section

The framing

Notice the approach Nowadays uses. Instead of naming alternatives or competitor, the company groups everyone under the broad label of “traditional options.” This smart framing lets them position everything else as outdated by default.

Rather than naming competitors, Nowadays says: “Everything you’ve been using represents the old way of doing things.” This creates a simple binary: modern approach vs. legacy approach.

The framing is clever because it makes the choice feel obvious. Who wants to stick with “traditional” when there’s a modern alternative?

The copy

Look at how Nowadays explains its advantage. The copy paragraph accomplishes three moves simultaneously:

  • Credibility signals upfront: “MIT engineers” and “first AI-native platform” establish technical authority before making any claims. Nowadays AI establishes why the product is better.
  • Quantifiable proof points: “400K+ venues” and “partnerships with top venues and agencies” provide concrete scale than vague promises. These are verifiable assets.
  • Outcome-focused language: “Source faster, negotiate smarter, simplify everything” translates technical capabilities into business results. The company doesn’t describe the AI algorithm but defers to what the AI algorithm can accomplish.

The copy logic creates an easy-to-follow and trust chain: MIT-level engineering (which in itself communicates high standards) — AI native-architecture — massive venue database — clear business outcomes.

Each element supports the next rather than functioning as isolated selling points.

The visuals

The before and after time bars make the difference visceral. It takes just seconds to see what makes Nowadays different and powerful. The grey vs. blue-silver bars allow buyers to process the visual proportions instantly.

The traditional approach doesn’t just look slower but ridiculous. Why would anyone choose to waste days when they could do the same task in minutes or seconds?

The chart format also makes it feel substantiated rather than promotional. Even without detailed methodology, the visual suggests measurement rather than marketing claims.

Not revolutionary but tactically powerful

Yes, I admit.

This isn’t some breakthrough framing or copywriting strategy. But what we’re seeing here is a competent execution of a simple principle: address the question homepage visitors are already asking.

Every buyer evaluating new software is mentally running a cost-benefit analysis against their current solution. Nowadays just makes that conversation explicit and guides it in its favor.

What makes it noteworthy is the placement and directness. The company is not hiding from the competitive question or saving it for later in the funnel. On the contrary, Nowadays is tackling it head-on during the critical first impression phase.

This only works because the company has genuine advantages that translate well to visual comparison. If your product benefits are subtle or complex, putting competitive framing front and center becomes risky rather than strategic.

When to apply this approach

This specific combination (grouping competitors as “traditional,” leading with unique differentiators, and using clear visual proof) works under specific conditions:

  • You need a genuine “first” claim that’s defensible. Nowadays can credibly say and differentiate on “MIT engineers.” That’s something very few SaaS + AI companies can take pride in.
  • The market must have established players using older approaches. The “traditional options” framing relies on a landscape of legacy solutions that buyers recognize as outdated. In emerging categories or where competitors also use modern approaches, this binary breaks down.
  • Your differentiators must be immediately graspable. “MIT engineers,” “400K+ venues,” and “AI-native” are proof points that require no explanation. Complex technical advantages or nuanced workflow improvements don’t work for this treatment. The differentiator needs to communicate value in seconds.
  • Your benefits must translate into dramatic visual comparisons. Days versus minutes works perfectly for bar charts. Subtle improvements like “better user experience” or “more intuitive interface” can’t create the same visual impact. The difference needs to be so obvious it looks ridiculous to choose the alternative.
  • This approach fails when your advantages are incremental, your category lacks clear legacy players, or your differentiators require context to convey product value.

Key takeaways

  • Address the competitive question where buyers are actually evaluating. Most companies hide competitive positioning on secondary pages or avoid it entirely. Put “Why choose us?” section on your homepage where buyers form first impressions, not buried in navigation, footer, or pricing pages.
  • Group competitors under broad labels when you have genuine differentiation. “Traditional options” works better than naming specific competitors because it frames everything else as outdated by default. This only works if you can credibly claim to present a new approach.
  • Lead with immediately graspable differentiators. Establish credibility through concrete proof points, like team credentials, quantifiable assets, and verifiable partnerships.
  • Use visual comparisons for dramatic differences only. Time-based improvements translate perfectly to before / after bar charts.
  • Build logical chains where each element supports the next. MIT engineers — AI-native platform — massive database — business outcomes create a trust sequence rather than isolated selling points that prospects have to connect themselves.
  • Your differentiators need to be genuine and defensible, not just positioning statements that sound good in marketing copy.
  • Recognize when this approach backfires. If your category lacks legacy players, your advantages are incremental, or your differentiators require explanation, direct competitive framing highlights weaknesses rather than strengths.

Victoria Rudi

I find the product strengths your buyers care most about, map out what to say & how to say it, then rewrite your homepage.
let’s talk about your homepage